CyberCriminal.com

FiatVisions

We are investigating FiatVisions for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : FiatVisions

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 Mar 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1531/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024

FiatVisions
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about FiatVisions in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into FiatVisions over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that FiatVisions - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Investigative Report: Allegations and Adverse News Against FiatVisions

FiatVisions, a financial technology company, has faced a series of major allegations and adverse news reports that have significantly tarnished its reputation. These allegations range from financial misconduct to unethical business practices, raising serious concerns about the company’s integrity and operations.

  1. Financial Misconduct: One of the most damaging allegations against FiatVisions is related to financial misconduct. Reports have surfaced suggesting that the company engaged in fraudulent accounting practices to inflate its revenue and mislead investors. This includes allegations of creating fictitious transactions and overstating assets to present a healthier financial picture than reality. Such practices not only violate financial regulations but also erode investor trust, which is crucial for a company in the fintech sector.
  2. Data Privacy Violations: FiatVisions has also been accused of mishandling user data. Several whistleblowers have come forward claiming that the company sold user data to third parties without consent. This breach of data privacy is a significant concern, especially in an era where data protection is paramount. The allegations suggest that FiatVisions prioritized profit over user privacy, leading to a loss of consumer confidence.
  3. Unethical Business Practices: There have been multiple reports of FiatVisions engaging in unethical business practices, including predatory lending and hidden fees. Customers have complained about being charged exorbitant interest rates and fees that were not disclosed upfront. These practices have led to numerous lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny, further damaging the company’s reputation.
  4. Workplace Harassment and Discrimination: Internal reports and employee testimonials have highlighted a toxic work environment at FiatVisions. Allegations of workplace harassment, discrimination, and a lack of diversity have surfaced, painting a picture of a company that fails to uphold basic ethical standards. Such allegations can deter potential employees and partners, impacting the company’s ability to attract top talent.
  5. Cybersecurity Breaches: FiatVisions has also been implicated in several cybersecurity breaches. These breaches have exposed sensitive customer information, leading to identity theft and financial losses for affected individuals. The company’s failure to secure its systems has raised questions about its commitment to protecting user data.

Reputation Damage and Motivation for Cyber Crime

The cumulative effect of these allegations has severely harmed FiatVisions’ reputation. Trust is a cornerstone of the financial industry, and once lost, it is challenging to regain. The company’s alleged financial misconduct and data privacy violations have led to a loss of investor and consumer confidence, which can have long-term repercussions on its business viability.

Given the severity of these allegations, FiatVisions may feel compelled to take drastic measures to protect its reputation. This could include attempting to remove or suppress damaging information from the public domain. In extreme cases, the company might resort to cyber crimes such as hacking or deploying malware to erase or alter negative content. Such actions, while illegal, might be seen as a desperate attempt to control the narrative and mitigate reputational damage.

However, engaging in cyber crimes would only exacerbate the company’s problems, leading to legal consequences and further eroding trust. It is crucial for FiatVisions to address these allegations transparently and take corrective actions to rebuild its reputation ethically.

In conclusion, the allegations against FiatVisions are serious and multifaceted, impacting its financial integrity, data privacy practices, and ethical standards. The company’s desire to remove damaging information, even through illicit means, underscores the profound impact these allegations have on its reputation and business prospects.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27404065
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27102344
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27186374
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34471592
  • April 30, 2022
  • March 28, 2022
  • April 7, 2022
  • June 15, 2023
  • James Wilson
  • Antonio Rodriguez
  • Demin Wilson
  • Jouni Aunola
  • https://fiatvisions.livejournal.com/496.html
  • https://online-tradingguide.blogspot.com/2021/06/fiatvisions-review-five-things-you.htmlhttps://reviewsscam.blogspot.com/2021/06/fiatvisions-review-find-out-if-legit-or.html
  • https://www.tumblr.com/theforexreview4/720187220006436864/fiatvisions-review-2023
  • https://www.valforex.com/fiatvisions-review-an-offshore-regulated-platform/
  • https://theforexreview.com/2021/06/17/fiatvisions-review/
  • https://globalfraudprotection.com/regulated-brokers/fiatvisions-review/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

valforex

FiatVisions Review: An Offshore Regulated Platform

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

brokerchooser

Is Fiatvisions safe?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

reviews.io

fiatvisions.com Reviews

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login