CyberCriminal.com

Financial Pacific

We are investigating Financial Pacific for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Financial Pacific

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : February 10, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2854/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 2 April 2025

Financial Pacific
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Financial Pacific in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Financial Pacific over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Financial Pacific - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

In the murky waters of Panama’s financial sector, few entities have cast as long and as dubious a shadow as the now-defunct brokerage firm, Financial Pacific (FP). Once hailed as a beacon of investment opportunities, FP’s legacy is now marred by allegations of embezzlement, money laundering, and a concerted effort to suppress the truth. As an investigative journalist, I’ve delved deep into the labyrinthine corridors of FP’s operations, uncovering a tale that serves as a stark warning to potential investors and a clarion call for regulatory intervention.

The Rise and Fall of Financial Pacific

Founded with the promise of offering premier brokerage services, FP quickly became a darling of Panama’s financial elite. However, beneath its polished facade lurked a cesspool of financial improprieties. The firm’s downfall began in 2012 when an internal audit revealed a staggering $12 million discrepancy. This revelation led to the intervention of the Superintendence of the Securities Market (SMV) and set off a chain of events that would expose the firm’s deep-seated corruption.​

The High Spirit Account: A Vessel for Malfeasance

Central to FP’s scandal was the notorious “High Spirit” account. Allegations surfaced that this account was used to manipulate stock prices, particularly those of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., with whispers of involvement reaching the highest echelons of power, including former President Ricardo Martinelli. The SMV’s investigation uncovered transactions ranging from $1 million to $4 million flowing through High Spirit, indicative of potential financial crimes within Panama’s stock market system. ​

A Web of Complicity

The tentacles of FP’s misconduct extended far and wide. In 2019, the Seventh Anti-Corruption Prosecutor consolidated two major cases against FP, focusing on the High Spirit account and a complaint from Belize’s Caye International Bank, which suffered losses after FP’s intervention by the SMV. Key figures, including FP’s former directors Iván Clare and West Valdés, found themselves under the prosecutorial microscope.

Further entanglements emerged with the involvement of Felipe “Pipo” Virzi and Cristóbal Salerno, both of whom played roles in funneling funds to cover FP’s financial gaps. Notably, a $7 million check from the state-owned Caja de Ahorros was traced back to these individuals, raising questions about the misuse of public funds and the extent of political collusion. ​

Silencing the Whistleblowers

In the wake of these revelations, one would expect a flurry of media coverage and public outcry. Instead, there was an eerie silence. Sources close to the matter revealed that FP engaged in aggressive tactics to suppress negative publicity. Journalists investigating the firm faced legal threats, and in some instances, were subjected to intimidation. The disappearance of Vernon Ramos, an SMV official probing FP’s activities, sent a chilling message to would-be whistleblowers. ​

Red Flags for Investors

For discerning investors, FP’s saga offers several cautionary lessons:

Opaque Operations: FP’s lack of transparency, especially concerning the High Spirit account, underscores the perils of investing in entities that operate in the shadows.

Regulatory Capture: The firm’s ability to allegedly co-opt regulatory officials, such as Ignacio Fábrega, highlights the risks posed by compromised oversight bodies. ​

Political Entanglements: FP’s connections with political figures and the misuse of state resources exemplify the dangers of intertwining business with politics.​

A Call to Action

The Financial Pacific debacle serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within financial systems and the lengths to which some will go to conceal malfeasance. Regulatory bodies must bolster their oversight mechanisms, ensuring that entities like FP cannot operate with impunity. Moreover, the press must be safeguarded against intimidation, allowing journalists to shine a light on corruption without fear of retribution.

Conclusion

Financial Pacific’s descent from a reputable brokerage to a byword for financial scandal is a tale of greed, deception, and the corrosive influence of unchecked power. For investors, it underscores the imperative of due diligence and the need to remain vigilant against entities that prioritize profit over principle. As we sift through the ashes of FP’s implosion, one can only hope that the lessons learned will fortify the financial landscape against future transgressions.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48922675
  • Alan E. Lyke
  • https://www.tumblr.com/newstimesmx/775087162476625920/financial-pacific-money-laundering-cases-combined
  • https://newsroompanama.com/2019/12/03/financial-pacific-money-laundering-cases-combined/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

newsroompanama

Financial Pacific money laundering cases combined

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

newsroompanama

Financial Pacific boss leaves preventive detention after 5 years

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

newsroompanama

Financial Pacific director loses bail bid

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login