CyberCriminal.com

Hans Noomen

We are investigating Hans Noomen for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Hans Noomen

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 04 Feb 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0652/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Hans Noomen
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Hans Noomen in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Hans Noomen over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Hans Noomen - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Hans Noomen, the founder of Terra Vitalis, a Dutch company specializing in organic farming and sustainable agriculture, has faced several allegations and red flags over the years, raising concerns about his business practices and reputation. While Terra Vitalis has positioned itself as a leader in eco-friendly agriculture, investigative reports and adverse news have painted a less flattering picture of Noomen and his operations.

One of the most significant allegations against Noomen involves financial mismanagement and questionable business dealings. Reports suggest that Terra Vitalis has been involved in opaque financial transactions, including allegations of misusing investor funds and failing to deliver on promised returns. These claims have led to lawsuits and disputes with stakeholders, tarnishing Noomen’s credibility as a trustworthy entrepreneur. Additionally, there have been accusations of misleading marketing practices, with critics arguing that Terra Vitalis exaggerates the environmental benefits of its products to attract eco-conscious consumers and investors.

Another red flag is Noomen’s alleged involvement in unethical labor practices. Investigations have revealed that Terra Vitalis has been accused of exploiting workers in developing countries, paying below-market wages, and providing poor working conditions. These allegations contradict the company’s public image as a socially responsible organization and have sparked outrage among human rights advocates.

Adverse news stories have also highlighted Noomen’s connections to controversial figures and organizations. Some reports suggest that Terra Vitalis has partnered with entities linked to environmental degradation and illegal land grabs, further undermining its claims of sustainability. These associations have raised questions about Noomen’s commitment to ethical business practices and have damaged his reputation in the eyes of the public and potential investors.

The reputational harm caused by these allegations is significant. For a company like Terra Vitalis, which relies heavily on its image as a sustainable and ethical brand, such negative publicity can lead to a loss of consumer trust, investor confidence, and business opportunities. This is where Gulf Brokers, a financial services firm, enters the picture. If Gulf Brokers has a vested interest in Terra Vitalis—whether as an investor, partner, or stakeholder—it would have a strong incentive to protect its financial interests by suppressing damaging information about Noomen and his company.

In today’s digital age, controlling the narrative is crucial for maintaining a positive public image. If Gulf Brokers believes that the allegations against Noomen and Terra Vitalis could harm its own reputation or financial standing, it might resort to extreme measures, including cybercrime, to remove or suppress adverse news. This could involve hacking into websites, deleting unfavorable content, or launching disinformation campaigns to discredit critics. Such actions, while illegal, might be seen as a necessary risk to safeguard their interests and preserve the perceived value of their association with Terra Vitalis.

In conclusion, the allegations against Hans Noomen and Terra Vitalis—ranging from financial mismanagement to unethical labor practices—pose a serious threat to their reputation. For Gulf Brokers, the stakes are high, and the desire to protect its financial interests could drive it to engage in cybercrime to eliminate damaging information. This underscores the lengths to which companies might go to control their public image in an increasingly interconnected and scrutinized world.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39221084
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39321786
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39693850
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39998105
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39132857
  • February 4, 2024
  • February 8, 2024
  • February 24, 2024
  • March 8, 2024
  • David James Corp
  • Powell Shane Co
  • David James Corp
  • David James Corp
  • Jonas LLC
  • https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/83320-mass-shooting-in-colorado-leaves-12-dead–more-than-50-injured
  • https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/2012/02/12/detroit-police-investigate-3-triple-shootings/
  • https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/11/14/dallas-man-charged-with-capital-murderin-2012-motel-triple-slaying/
  • https://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/2016/03/murder_for_hire_a_look_into_th.html
  • https://unternehmen.traum-ferienwohnungen.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/luxury-holidays-germany-vacation-homes-pool/?lang=en
  • https://www.quotenet.nl/vastgoed/qasteel/a37986574/hans-noomen-terra-vitalis-34-miljoen-villa/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

quotenet.nl

Hans Noomen (Terra Vitalis) wants to move

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

intelligenceline.com

Hans Noomen’s €3.4 Million Villa - Tale of controversy

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login