CyberCriminal.com

Jared J. Davis

We are investigating Jared J. Davis for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Jared J. Davis

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : September 25, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2781/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Jared J. Davis
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Jared J. Davis in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jared J. Davis over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jared J. Davis - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Between 2012 and 2016, Davis orchestrated a fraudulent binary options investment scheme through Erie Marketing LLC, headquartered in Sandusky, Ohio. Operating under various trade names, including OptionMint, OptionKing, and OptionQueen, the scheme lured unsuspecting investors with the promise of high returns. However, the reality was far from the glossy facade presented.

The Mechanics of Deception

Binary options, at their core, are financial instruments where investors predict the future price of a given asset. In legitimate setups, these are traded on regulated exchanges that match opposing investors, with the exchange remaining neutral. Davis’s operation, however, deviated significantly from this model. He failed to disclose that he effectively took the opposing position on each trade. Moreover, he frequently manipulated the trading platform’s software settings to skew the odds against customers, ensuring their losses and his gains. Such practices are not just unethical but outright fraudulent.

The Tax Evasion Escapade

Davis’s disregard for legal obligations extended beyond defrauding investors. Between 2014 and 2016, he conveniently “forgot” to file personal tax returns, despite raking in substantial profits from his dubious ventures. This deliberate oversight led to charges of tax evasion, to which he pleaded guilty in April 2022. It’s one thing to swindle investors, but to dodge taxes? That’s a federal offense.

The SEC Steps In

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) couldn’t turn a blind eye to Davis’s antics. In December 2018, they charged him and his business partner for operating an unregistered and fraudulent binary options business. The charges highlighted the deceptive nature of their operations and their blatant disregard for securities laws designed to protect investors.

The CFTC’s Verdict

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) also took action against Davis. Their findings were damning: Davis defrauded customers by making material misrepresentations and omissions. He failed to disclose his opposing positions on trades and manipulated trading software to increase customer losses. Such actions not only violate ethical standards but also breach federal regulations governing commodity trading.

The Art of Information Suppression

Beyond his fraudulent activities, Davis exhibited a keen interest in controlling the narrative surrounding his ventures. Reports suggest that he employed various tactics to suppress adverse information:

  • Legal Intimidation: Davis is known to have issued legal threats to individuals and entities attempting to expose his fraudulent schemes. This strategy aims to instill fear and deter whistleblowers from coming forward, effectively silencing potential critics.

  • Online Reputation Management: In the digital age, a tarnished online reputation can be detrimental. Davis allegedly employed services to scrub negative information from search engine results, creating an illusion of legitimacy. This deceptive practice misleads potential investors and obscures the truth about his operations.

The Call for Vigilance

The saga of Jared J. Davis serves as a cautionary tale for investors and regulatory bodies alike. His intricate web of deceit underscores the importance of thorough due diligence and skepticism, especially when confronted with too-good-to-be-true investment opportunities. Potential investors are urged to:

  • Verify Credentials: Scrutinize the backgrounds of individuals and entities offering investment opportunities. A lack of transparency or a history of misconduct should raise immediate red flags.

  • Demand Transparency: Legitimate businesses operate with openness. Insist on clear, verifiable information about investment strategies, risks, and returns.

  • Consult Regulatory Bodies: Before investing, check for any regulatory actions or warnings against the individual or entity in question. Regulatory bodies like the SEC and CFTC maintain records of enforcement actions that can provide invaluable insights.

Conclusion

Jared J. Davis’s story is a stark reminder of the lengths to which some individuals will go to defraud and deceive. His attempts to suppress adverse information further highlight the need for vigilance and proactive measures to protect investors. Regulatory authorities must continue to pursue such individuals, ensuring they face the consequences of their actions. In the end, transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of a trustworthy financial system, and it’s imperative that we uphold these principles to safeguard the interests of all stakeholders.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44923823
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45009922
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50385836
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50296707
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50266888
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50101659
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50100284
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50414716
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50513386
  • September 25, 2024
  • March 28, 2025
  • April 01, 2025
  • cftc.gov
  • Dennis M. Hartman
  • Faulkner Media Inc.
  • Rogers Media Incorporation
  • Bagget Media International
  • Issac Media Corporation
  • Ram Media Association
  • Oppenheimer Media Ltd
  • Jonn Elton
  • https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8698-23
  • https://www.tumblr.com/binaryfraud/763067428197580800/binary-options-fraud-jared-davis-arrested-in-the
  • https://www.financemagnates.com/binary-options/regulation/cftc-charges-operator-of-three-binary-options-brands-with-fraud/
  • https://sydneychronicle.com/2018/02/28/montana-man-accused-of-running-fraudulent-investment-scheme-in-sandusky/
  • https://sydneychronicle.com/2023/01/19/cftc-wins-case-against-already-jailed-binary-options-scammer-jared-j-davis/
  • https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2019/06/28/trial-david-dooley-convicted-killing-michelle-mockbee-featured-dateline/1597910001/
  • https://www.forexfactory.com/news/1218136-federal-court-orders-former-head-of-international-binary
  • https://atozmarkets.com/news/binary-options-fraud-jared-davis-arrested-in-the-us/
  • http://www.financefeeds.com/cftc-wins-case-against-already-jailed-binary-options-scammer-jared-j-davis
  • http://toledoblade.com/business/2018/06/05/Montana-man-accused-of-running-a-fraudulent-investment-scheme-in-Sandusky.html/
  • https://www.toledoblade.com/business/2018/06/05/Montana-man-accused-of-running-a-fraudulent-investment-scheme-in-Sandusky.html/
  • http://toledoblade.com/business/2018/06/05/Montana-man-Accused-OF-ruNNing-a-fraudulent-investment-schEme-in-SanduSKY.HTML

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

forexfactory.com

Federal Court Orders Former Head of International Binary Options Scheme to Pay More than $561,000 in Restitution

  • Restored
Visit Link

cftc.gov

Federal Court Orders Former Head of International Binary Options Scheme to Pay More than $561,000 in Restitution

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

justice.gov

Former head of Sandusky business charged with defrauding investors out of $10 million

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login