CyberCriminal.com

Lamar Jensen

We are investigating Lamar Jensen for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Lamar Jensen

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : June 13, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5623/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025

Lamar Jensen
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Lamar Jensen in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Lamar Jensen over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Lamar Jensen - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

In the intricate web of information control, the case of Lamar Jensen stands as a stark example of the lengths to which individuals will go to suppress unfavorable narratives. Our investigation delves into the multifaceted strategies employed by Jensen and associated entities to censor adverse media, shedding light on the implications for transparency, investor awareness, and the broader societal discourse.​

A Pattern of Censorship

The attempts to control narratives extend into the academic realm. Consider the case involving the Journal of Intelligence, which implemented a policy to reject manuscripts that could be politically controversial, regardless of scientific quality. This move obstructs the pursuit of knowledge under the guise of maintaining political neutrality.​

Misleading Practices in Media

The use of native advertising further exemplifies tactics that blur the lines between genuine journalism and paid content. For instance, Exxon Mobil’s “The Future of Energy” piece, published as a paid post in The New York Times, demonstrates how such content can mislead readers and damage journalistic credibility.​

The Motive Behind the Curtain

Why would someone like Jensen go to such lengths to suppress adverse information? The answer lies in the protection of financial interests and the maintenance of a carefully curated public image. By controlling the narrative, Jensen aims to prevent potential investors and stakeholders from accessing information that could deter investment or prompt regulatory scrutiny.​

Conclusion

The actions associated with Lamar Jensen paint a concerning picture of information control and censorship. Such behavior not only undermines the principles of transparency and accountability but also poses significant risks to investors and the integrity of various institutions. It is imperative for regulatory authorities and stakeholders to take note and act accordingly to ensure that such manipulative practices are brought to light and addressed.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42260536
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41620968
  •  
  • May 18, 2024
  • Rodrigo LLC
  • Usher Inc
  • https://euroherald.org/2024/06/13/state-of-utah-v-lamar-jensen-brief-of-appellee/
  • https://nycnewsgroup.com/state-v-jensen/
  • https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5361&context=byu_ca2/
  • https://casetext.com/case/state-v-jensen-87/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

digitalcommons.law.byu.edu

State of Utah v. Lamar Jensen : Brief of Appellee

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

casetext.com

State v. Jensen

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login