LimeFX
We are investigating LimeFX for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : LimeFX
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 12 Sep 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 2646/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating LimeFX for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating LimeFX for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
LimeFX, a forex and CFD brokerage, has faced numerous allegations and red flags over the years, raising serious concerns about its credibility and business practices. These issues have been documented by regulatory bodies, investigative journalists, and aggrieved clients, painting a troubling picture of the company. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news, along with an analysis of how these harm LimeFX’s reputation and why the company might resort to extreme measures, including cybercrime, to suppress this information.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
- Regulatory Warnings: LimeFX has been flagged by multiple financial regulators, including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), for operating without proper authorization. These warnings highlight the company’s lack of compliance with financial regulations, which is a significant red flag for potential clients.
- Withdrawal Issues: Numerous clients have reported difficulties withdrawing funds from their LimeFX accounts. Complaints range from unexplained delays to outright refusal to process withdrawals, suggesting potential liquidity issues or unethical practices aimed at retaining client funds.
- Misleading Advertising: LimeFX has been accused of using aggressive and misleading marketing tactics, including false promises of high returns and low risks. Such practices are not only unethical but also dangerous for inexperienced traders who may lose significant amounts of money.
- Lack of Transparency: The company has been criticized for its opaque fee structure, with clients reporting hidden charges and unexpected deductions from their accounts. This lack of transparency undermines trust and raises questions about the company’s integrity.
- Negative Client Reviews: Online forums and review sites are rife with complaints from LimeFX clients, many of whom describe poor customer service, unresponsive support teams, and a general lack of professionalism. These reviews further damage the company’s reputation and deter potential clients.
- Cybersecurity Concerns: There have been allegations of inadequate cybersecurity measures, with some clients claiming their accounts were hacked due to LimeFX’s negligence. This raises serious concerns about the safety of client funds and personal information.
Reputational Damage and Motives for Suppression:
The cumulative effect of these allegations is a severely tarnished reputation for LimeFX. Regulatory warnings and negative client reviews erode trust, while withdrawal issues and misleading advertising suggest a company more interested in profit than client welfare. For a brokerage firm, reputation is everything; without trust, it becomes nearly impossible to attract and retain clients.
Given the gravity of these allegations, LimeFX has a strong incentive to suppress negative information. If these stories gain widespread attention, the company could face increased regulatory scrutiny, legal action, and a significant loss of business. In such a scenario, the temptation to resort to cybercrime—such as hacking into websites to remove negative reviews or intimidating whistleblowers—becomes a plausible, albeit illegal, strategy. By silencing critics and erasing damaging content, LimeFX could attempt to rebuild its image and continue operating without addressing the underlying issues.
However, such actions would only compound the company’s problems, leading to further legal and ethical repercussions. The cycle of deception and suppression is unsustainable, and ultimately, the truth has a way of surfacing, no matter how hard a company tries to bury it.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44560136
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44552098
- Sep 12, 2024
- Sep 11, 2024
- VectorNet Systems limited
- CrystalNexus Labs
- https://t-sm.spb.ru/en/limefx-review-forex-broker-trading-markets-legit/
- https://www.eurostegi.com.gr/limefx-review-forex-broker-trading-markets-legit/
- https://www.oyostatejudiciary.oy.gov.ng/limefx-international-review-forex-broker-trading/
Evidence Box
We are investigating LimeFX for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
nssmc
On the guard of investors’ protection: The NSSMC has updated the list of dubious investment projects
- Adverse News
oyostatejudiciary
LimeFX International Review, Forex Broker&Trading Markets, Legit or a Scam-WikiFX
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 4 ratings
Gabriel Reed
Share
Regulatory warnings and withdrawal issues?
Alexander White
Share
definetly lose your money. no doubt
Isabella Green
Share
LimeFX’s marketing paints a picture of trust and innovation, but scratch the surface, and you’ll find unclear fee structures and limited accountability. its Trash really. The so-called intuitive platforms won't protect your funds when things go wrong.
Lily White
Share
Misleading ads, unresponsive support, and hidden fees? Sounds like a nightmare for traders. Stayaaa awaay...