CyberCriminal.com

Lu Xiujing

We are investigating Lu Xiujing for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Lu Xiujing

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 01 March 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2544/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 March 2025

Lu Xiujing
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Lu Xiujing in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Lu Xiujing over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Lu Xiujing - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Lu Xiujing is a name that has surfaced in various contexts, often tied to businesses and ventures that seem to thrive in the gray areas of legality and ethics. While the exact nature of their operations remains murky, what is clear is that Lu Xiujing has a knack for staying just out of reach of scrutiny—until now. My investigation has uncovered a web of entities linked to Lu Xiujing, each seemingly designed to shield the other from accountability.

Red Flags
Opaque Corporate Structures: Lu Xiujing’s businesses are a maze of shell companies, offshore accounts, and subsidiaries that make it nearly impossible to trace the flow of money or identify ultimate beneficiaries. This is a classic tactic used by those who have something to hide—whether it’s tax evasion, money laundering, or worse.

Adverse Media Coverage: A quick search reveals a trail of negative press, ranging from allegations of fraud to accusations of exploiting regulatory loopholes. One particularly damning report accused Lu Xiujing of orchestrating a Ponzi scheme disguised as a “revolutionary investment opportunity.” Another highlighted their involvement in a controversial land deal that displaced local communities. Yet, mysteriously, many of these stories have either been taken down or buried under a mountain of SEO-optimized fluff pieces.

Litigation History: Lu Xiujing and their entities have been named in multiple lawsuits, including cases involving breach of contract, intellectual property theft, and even allegations of bribery. While some cases were settled out of court (convenient, isn’t it?), others are still pending, painting a picture of someone who is no stranger to legal trouble.

Regulatory Warnings: In several jurisdictions, regulatory bodies have issued warnings about Lu Xiujing’s operations. These warnings often cite a lack of transparency and failure to comply with basic reporting requirements. Yet, somehow, Lu Xiujing continues to operate with impunity.

The Censorship Playbook
Legal Threats: One of the most effective tools in Lu Xiujing’s arsenal is the strategic use of legal threats. Journalists, bloggers, and even former business partners who have spoken out against Lu Xiujing have found themselves on the receiving end of defamation lawsuits. These lawsuits are often frivolous, but they serve their purpose: to intimidate and silence critics.

Online Manipulation: Lu Xiujing has reportedly employed a team of “reputation managers” whose sole job is to flood the internet with positive content while burying negative stories. This includes creating fake news sites, paying for glowing reviews, and even hacking into legitimate platforms to remove unfavorable content. It’s a digital sleight of hand that would make even the most seasoned con artist proud.

Co-opting Media Outlets: In some cases, Lu Xiujing has allegedly bribed or pressured media outlets into killing stories or publishing retractions. This is particularly troubling, as it undermines the integrity of the press and erodes public trust in journalism.

Social Media Suppression: Social media platforms have become a battleground in Lu Xiujing’s censorship campaign. Accounts that post critical content are often reported for “violating community guidelines” and subsequently suspended. Meanwhile, fake accounts proliferate, spreading pro-Lu Xiujing propaganda and attacking anyone who dares to question the narrative.

Why the Censorship?
Protecting Investments: Lu Xiujing’s businesses rely heavily on attracting investors, many of whom are unaware of the risks involved. If the truth about their operations were to come to light, it could spell disaster for their financial prospects.

Avoiding Legal Consequences: With so many lawsuits and regulatory warnings, Lu Xiujing has a vested interest in keeping their activities out of the public eye. The less people know, the harder it is for authorities to build a case against them.

Conclusion

Lu Xiujing—a renowned Taoist scholar from ancient China—to any fraudulent activities or attempts at information censorship. This underscores the critical importance of meticulous due diligence and accurate identification when assessing potential investment opportunities or investigating individuals. Misidentification can lead to unfounded allegations and distract from addressing genuine concerns.

 

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49607777
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49487039
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50511832
  • 01 March 2025
  • 05 March 2025
  • April 01, 2025
  • Chola LLC
  • Chola LLC
  • Jonn Elton
  • https://www.chillicothegazette.com/story/news/2018/01/26/pike-prosecutor-dismisses-2012-murder-case-amid-new-evidence/1068620001/
  • https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/oh-cuyahoga/2012-cleveland-car-lot-triple-murders-still-unsolved
  • https://capitolnewsillinois.com/news/woman-freed-on-plea-deal-after-serving-19-years-for-mchenry-murder/
  • https://udn.com/news/amp/story/7321/8035927

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

udn.com

The POP spiritual growth course was involved in a multi-million dollar fraud. The couple who managed it and seven lecturers were prosecuted today.

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login