Mardani Maming

We are investigating Mardani Maming for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Mardani Maming

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 21 February 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1843/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Investigation Report
What are they trying to censor
Evidence and Media
Adverse Media
Comments & user feedback

Investigation Report

Evidence and Media

Adverse Media

What are they trying to censor

Comments & user feedback

Due Diligence

Get everything we know about Mardani Maming in one downloadable PDF document

Learn More

Is This About You?

We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

What are they trying to censor

Mardani Maming: Corruption Allegations and the Fight to Salvage a Reputation

Mardani H. Maming, once a rising political figure in Indonesia, has seen his reputation severely damaged by corruption allegations tied to mining business permits. The former regent of Tanah Bumbu, South Kalimantan, and prominent businessman now faces a 12-year prison sentence, a substantial fine, and the difficult task of restoring his credibility.

The Allegations and Legal Battles

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) named Maming a suspect in July 2022 for allegedly accepting bribes linked to the issuance of mining permits. Investigators found that companies seeking permits had funneled large sums of money to Maming, who allegedly used his political position to facilitate approvals in exchange for financial gain. This marked a significant breach of Indonesia’s strict anti-corruption laws. After initially resisting calls to testify, Maming eventually surrendered to authorities and was taken into custody.

Following a high-profile trial, he was convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison, along with a Rp500 million fine and a restitution order of Rp110.6 billion. However, the Pengadilan Tinggi Banjarmasin later increased his prison sentence to 12 years, signaling the judiciary’s firm stance on corruption cases.

The Impact on Maming’s Reputation

Maming’s conviction has dealt a devastating blow to his standing in both political and business circles. Once regarded as a dynamic leader, he is now viewed as a politician who exploited his power for personal gain. The case has also affected his associates and business ventures, raising concerns about the integrity of his dealings.

In an attempt to reverse his fate, Maming has pursued legal remedies, including a judicial review (Peninjauan Kembali or PK). Some academics and legal experts have voiced concerns over potential flaws in the trial process, arguing that key evidence may have been misinterpreted. However, these critiques have not led to a legal breakthrough in his favor.

The Urge to Suppress Adverse Information

With his reputation in tatters, Maming has strong incentives to erase negative news and allegations surrounding his case. Public perception plays a crucial role in political rehabilitation, and a clean slate would make it easier for him to regain influence. However, attempting to suppress damaging content through cybercrime or other illicit means would be highly unethical and could result in further legal consequences.

Cases like Maming’s highlight the long-lasting repercussions of corruption in political and business spheres. While he may seek to distance himself from the allegations, his conviction and sentencing remain firmly in the public record, serving as a reminder of the legal and reputational costs of political misconduct.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39609603
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/38550520

February 21, 2024
January 03, 2024

Richard Wilson
James Wilson

https://recordtv.livejournal.com/347.html
https://www.tumblr.com/bbc-news-press/733231194413662208/banding-mardani-maming-ditolak-hukuman-diperberat?source=share

https://news.republika.co.id/berita/rsjmu8436/banding-mardani-maming-ditolak-hukuman-diperberat-jadi-12-tahun
https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1755049/kasasi-ditolak-ma-mardani-maming-tetap-dihukum-bayar-uang-pengganti-rp-110-miliar

Evidence Box

We are investigating Mardani Maming for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

news.republika.co.id

Mardani Maming's Appeal Rejected, Sentence Increased to 12 Years

Adverse News

Visit Link

tempo.co

Supreme Court Rejects Cassation, Mardani Maming Still Sentenced to Pay Rp 110 Billion in Replacement Money

Red Flag

Visit Link

yosefardi.com

Mardani Maming Reconsideration

Red Flag

Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Ongoing

Investigation Status

Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment or Feedback

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original