CyberCriminal.com

Meliorate Limited

We are investigating Meliorate Limited for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Meliorate Limited

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 07 Feb 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9044/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Meliorate Limited
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Meliorate Limited in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Meliorate Limited over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Meliorate Limited - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Meliorate Limited has faced several significant allegations and adverse reports that have notably impacted its reputation:

Unregulated Operations and Fraudulent Practices: Investigations have revealed that Meliorate Limited operates without proper regulatory oversight, raising concerns about its legitimacy. The company has been blacklisted by financial authorities, including the Central Bank of Russia and Germany’s BaFin, due to fraudulent activities. Investors have reported difficulties in withdrawing funds after initial profits, a tactic commonly associated with scam operations.

Improper Use of Copyright Takedown Notices: Reports indicate that Meliorate Limited attempted to suppress negative reviews and adverse news by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This strategy involved potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury, aiming to conceal critical information from public view.

Negative User Experiences: Users have expressed dissatisfaction with Meliorate Limited’s services, citing issues such as the inability to withdraw funds and unfulfilled promises. One user reported that when they requested proof of the company’s regulatory status, the communication was abruptly terminated, indicating a lack of transparency.

These allegations significantly harm Meliorate Limited’s reputation by highlighting unethical practices, lack of regulatory compliance, and poor customer relations. Such negative perceptions can deter potential clients and investors, leading to financial losses and legal challenges.

To mitigate these reputational damages, Meliorate Limited might seek to remove or suppress these adverse reports, even if it involves unethical or illegal methods. By eliminating negative information, the company could attempt to present a more favorable image to the public and potential investors. However, such actions could further damage their credibility and lead to additional legal consequences if discovered.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32702878
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32702872
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32702871
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32702827
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30627254
  • February 24, 2023
  • February 24, 2023
  • February 24, 2023
  • February 24, 2023
  • February 07, 2023
  • Yazdan Mehrabi
  • Yazdan Mehrabi
  • Yazdan Mehrabi
  • Sima Atashi
  • Sima Atashi
  • https://yazdan228.blogspot.com/2023/02/meliorate-limited-reviews_24.html
  • https://telegra.ph/Meliorate-Limited-02-24-2
  • https://yazdan228.blogspot.com/2023/02/warst-du-betrogen-von-meliorate-limited.html
  • https://telegra.ph/Meliorate-Limited-02-24
  • https://penzu.com/p/a9dd4d30
  • https://forexdepositbonuses.com/best-brokers/meliorate-limited-reviews
  • https://forexrev.com/broker/meliorate-limited/
  • https://scamrecovery.net/de/trading/melioratelimited/
  • https://www.anwalt.de/rechtstipps/betrug-bei-meliorate-limited-melioratelimited-com-erfahrungen-zur-auszahlung-207

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

forexdepositbonuses.com

Meliorate Limited Reviews

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

forexrev.com

Meliorate Limited

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login