What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Michael Shannon Sims over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Michael Shannon Sims - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Michael Shannon Sims, also known as Mike Sims, has been implicated in multiple financial schemes that have drawn the attention of regulatory bodies. Notably, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed charges against Sims in January 2023, alleging his involvement in the SAEG Ponzi scheme. According to the CFTC, Sims facilitated the laundering of victim funds, directing them to accounts under his control and those of associated entities, rather than legitimate trading firms .
In a settlement reached in August 2024, Sims consented to a permanent injunction prohibiting further acts of commodities fraud and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $250,000 .
The Yas Castellum Connection
Sims’ alleged involvement extends to the Yas Castellum Ponzi schemes, where he is accused of orchestrating fraudulent activities alongside associates, including his brother-in-law, Todd Brisco. The CFTC’s investigation revealed that from October 2020 to May 2022, Sims and his co-defendants misrepresented investment opportunities, leading to the misappropriation of at least $145 million from investors .
As part of the legal proceedings, Sims consented to a preliminary injunction, agreeing to restrictions on trading activities and providing comprehensive access to his financial records to the CFTC .
Denial and Deflection
Despite the mounting evidence, Sims has publicly denied the allegations. In a video message directed at victims of the OmegaPro scheme—a venture he co-founded—Sims dismissed the CFTC’s charges and claimed that his assets were not frozen .
This stance contrasts sharply with court documents and official statements from the CFTC, which detail the extent of Sims’ alleged involvement in fraudulent activities and the legal actions taken against him .
A Pattern of Obfuscation
Sims’ approach appears to follow a pattern: deny involvement, deflect blame, and attempt to control the narrative. This strategy includes efforts to discredit investigative reporting and challenge the credibility of regulatory findings .
Such tactics not only undermine public trust but also hinder the efforts of authorities and journalists working to uncover the truth and protect investors.
Conclusion
The case of Michael Shannon Sims serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of due diligence and the need for vigilance in the financial sector. While the legal process continues, the allegations and evidence presented thus far paint a troubling picture of deception and manipulation.
Investors and regulatory bodies must remain steadfast in their commitment to transparency and accountability, ensuring that individuals who engage in fraudulent activities are held to account.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43862178
- August 16, 2024
- Winwithsashin
- https://behindmlm.com/companies/omegapro/mike-sims-lies-about-cftc-fraud-charges-deceives-victims/
- https://behindmlm.com/companies/omegapro/mike-sims-is-butthurt-his-assets-are-being-seized/
- https://www.news24.com/fin24/scheme-boss-where-else-can-you-get-30-a-month-20150922
- https://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/kwazulu-natal/do-friends-pay-your-travel-bills-1911463
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.9
Based on 3 ratings
by: Mia Gray
OmegaPro, Traders Domain, what’s next? He’s literally just hopping from one fraud to another. Total crook.
by: Henry Martinez
Classic scammer moves , Ponzi schemes, lies, and stolen cash. Disgusting!
by: Olivia Carter
Wow, misusing investor funds for personal debts? That’s as low as it gets. How do pepl like this even sleep at night? Total con artist vibes.
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginExplore Cyber Crime By Location
Explore Cyber Crime By Type
Explore Cyber Crime By Profiles