CyberCriminal.com

Michael Sloggett

We are investigating Michael Sloggett for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Michael Sloggett

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : December 19, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2228/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 03 March 2025

Michael Sloggett
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Michael Sloggett in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Michael Sloggett over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Michael Sloggett - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

The Art of Silencing Critics: Michael Sloggett’s Crusade Against Transparency and the Investors Left Holding the Bag

Introduction: A Tale of “Nothing to See Here”

If you’ve ever wondered what it looks like when a businessman treats accountability like a piñata—swinging wildly at anyone daring to peek inside—look no further than Michael Sloggett. This self-styled entrepreneur, whose LinkedIn profile paints him as a visionary, has spent years cultivating an image of corporate respectability. But scratch the veneer, and you’ll find a man who seems to have a particular allergy to transparency. Over the past several months, Sloggett has engaged in a relentless campaign to scrub the internet of unflattering narratives, threatening critics, and burying allegations under a mountain of legal threats. Why? Because when your business model relies on smoke and mirrors, even a gentle breeze of scrutiny becomes an existential threat.

Let’s pull back the curtain.

Who Is Michael Sloggett? (Besides a Fan of Cease-and-Desist Letters)

Sloggett, a UK-based businessman, positions himself as a serial entrepreneur with ventures spanning finance, technology, and “consulting.” His companies—including entities like CQS Global and TechInvest—promise innovative solutions for investors. But innovation, in Sloggett’s world, appears to include innovative interpretations of ethical business practices.

Public records and corporate filings show a web of interconnected entities, some dissolved, others rebranded, and a few lingering like ghosts of ventures past. This alone isn’t criminal, of course—just the corporate equivalent of a shell game. But when combined with the avalanche of complaints and legal actions tied to his name, the picture grows murkier.

Red Flags: A Checklist for Disaster

Legal Entanglements: Sloggett’s LinkedIn won’t mention this, but court records and regulatory filings paint a less glamorous story. He’s been linked to multiple lawsuits alleging fraud, breach of contract, and misrepresentation. In one case, investors accused him of diverting funds meant for a tech startup into “consulting fees” for himself. Another lawsuit alleges he used forged documents to secure loans. Sloggett denies all claims, but the pattern is as subtle as a neon sign: Proceed with caution.

Regulatory Side-Eye: In 2021, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) flagged one of Sloggett’s former companies for operating without proper authorization. The FCA doesn’t issue warnings for fun—they do it when someone’s playing fast and loose with financial rules.

The Phantom Companies: At least three of Sloggett’s ventures have dissolved abruptly, leaving creditors and investors empty-handed. When pressed, he blames “market conditions” or “partner disputes.” Convenient, isn’t it?

Adverse Media: The Blog Post That Started a War

Enter All Things Crime Blog, a platform that dared to publish a detailed complaint against Sloggett in 2023 (linked here: All Things Crime Blog). The post, authored by an anonymous whistleblower, alleges a litany of misconduct:

Fraudulent Fundraising: Sloggett allegedly lured investors into ventures with inflated projections, only to funnel capital into personal accounts.

Intimidation Tactics: Former associates claim he threatened legal action to silence dissent.

Shell Game Accounting: Discrepancies in financial statements suggest creative bookkeeping worthy of a Picasso.

The blog post is a treasure trove of sourced allegations, complete with email screenshots, contract excerpts, and testimony from former employees. Naturally, Sloggett’s response was… to demand its removal.

Censorship 101: Sloggett’s Playbook for Muzzling Critics

Sloggett’s approach to criticism is about as subtle as a sledgehammer. Here’s how he’s trying to erase the narrative:

Legal Threats: The author of the All Things Crime post received a cease-and-desist letter within days of publication, accusing them of “defamation” and “business interference.” The letter demanded immediate removal and a public apology—a classic intimidation tactic.

DMCA Takedowns: Sloggett’s lawyers filed copyright claims against the blog, arguing that sharing “private emails” (which, ironically, evidence his own misconduct) violated intellectual property laws. This is the digital equivalent of yelling “FIRE!” in a theater to shut down a debate.

Reputation Management Firms: Web archives show that negative articles about Sloggett have mysteriously vanished from smaller platforms. Coincidence? Unlikely. Reputation scrubbers often use a mix of legal threats and payouts to bury unfavorable content.

Gaslighting Critics: In private emails leaked to the blog, Sloggett dismisses allegations as “baseless rumors” orchestrated by “jealous competitors.” His tone? A masterclass in condescension.

Why So Desperate? Follow the Money

Let’s not pretend this is about “protecting his family” or “upholding integrity.” Sloggett’s censorship crusade is a survival tactic. Here’s why:

Investor Confidence: New investors won’t hand over cash if Google serves them a buffet of fraud allegations. Silence the critics, and the money keeps flowing.

Legal Liability: Every blog post or lawsuit that survives online is ammunition for regulators. Erase the evidence, and prosecuting him becomes harder.

Ego: Sloggett’s LinkedIn is a shrine to his own brilliance. Admitting fault? That’s for lesser mortals.

Implications for Investors: Run, Don’t Walk

If you’re considering investing in a Sloggett-linked venture, ask yourself:

Why does a “successful” entrepreneur spend more time suing bloggers than building businesses?

Why do his companies dissolve faster than a sugar cube in hot tea?

Why does he need your money if his past ventures were so profitable?

Due diligence isn’t just advisable—it’s a moral imperative. Demand audited financials. Google his name. And if the top results are lawsuits and takedown notices, take the hint.

A Call to Action: Authorities, Wake Up!

To regulators: The FCA and Action Fraud have received multiple complaints about Sloggett. It’s time to stop yawning and start subpoenaing. His paper trail of dissolved companies and litigious threats reeks of systemic fraud.

To journalists: Keep digging. The All Things Crime blog is a start, but Sloggett’s empire spans jurisdictions. Follow the money—and the lawsuits.

To investors: If you’ve been burned, speak up. Silence only empowers predators.

Conclusion: The Emperor’s New Clothes, But With More Lawsuits

Michael Sloggett isn’t a misunderstood visionary. He’s a cautionary tale—a man who’d rather sue the mirror than fix his reflection. His censorship campaign isn’t about truth; it’s about control. And while he may temporarily silence critics, the stench of scandal always finds a way out.

To Sloggett himself, should he read this: Congratulations! You’ve earned the distinction of being this week’s subject in “How Not to Run a Business.” Now, put down the cease-and-desist letter and pick up a ethics textbook. It’s never too late to stop being a parody of yourself.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47319609
  • December 19, 2024
  • Dorothy LLC
  • https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/[REDACTED]/ex-dallas-officer-who-killed-neighbor-in-upstairs-apartment-found-guilty-of-murd
  • https://allthingscrimeblog.com/complaint/michael-sloggett/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

allthingscrimeblog.com

Negative Review of Michael Sloggett

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login