Michael Sloggett

The Art of Silencing Critics: Michael Sloggett’s Crusade Against Transparency and the Investors Left Holding the Bag

Introduction: A Tale of “Nothing to See Here”

If you’ve ever wondered what it looks like when a businessman treats accountability like a piñata—swinging wildly at anyone daring to peek inside—look no further than Michael Sloggett. This self-styled entrepreneur, whose LinkedIn profile paints him as a visionary, has spent years cultivating an image of corporate respectability. But scratch the veneer, and you’ll find a man who seems to have a particular allergy to transparency. Over the past several months, Sloggett has engaged in a relentless campaign to scrub the internet of unflattering narratives, threatening critics, and burying allegations under a mountain of legal threats. Why? Because when your business model relies on smoke and mirrors, even a gentle breeze of scrutiny becomes an existential threat.

Let’s pull back the curtain.

Who Is Michael Sloggett? (Besides a Fan of Cease-and-Desist Letters)

Sloggett, a UK-based businessman, positions himself as a serial entrepreneur with ventures spanning finance, technology, and “consulting.” His companies—including entities like CQS Global and TechInvest—promise innovative solutions for investors. But innovation, in Sloggett’s world, appears to include innovative interpretations of ethical business practices.

Public records and corporate filings show a web of interconnected entities, some dissolved, others rebranded, and a few lingering like ghosts of ventures past. This alone isn’t criminal, of course—just the corporate equivalent of a shell game. But when combined with the avalanche of complaints and legal actions tied to his name, the picture grows murkier.

Red Flags: A Checklist for Disaster

Legal Entanglements: Sloggett’s LinkedIn won’t mention this, but court records and regulatory filings paint a less glamorous story. He’s been linked to multiple lawsuits alleging fraud, breach of contract, and misrepresentation. In one case, investors accused him of diverting funds meant for a tech startup into “consulting fees” for himself. Another lawsuit alleges he used forged documents to secure loans. Sloggett denies all claims, but the pattern is as subtle as a neon sign: Proceed with caution.

Regulatory Side-Eye: In 2021, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) flagged one of Sloggett’s former companies for operating without proper authorization. The FCA doesn’t issue warnings for fun—they do it when someone’s playing fast and loose with financial rules.

The Phantom Companies: At least three of Sloggett’s ventures have dissolved abruptly, leaving creditors and investors empty-handed. When pressed, he blames “market conditions” or “partner disputes.” Convenient, isn’t it?

Adverse Media: The Blog Post That Started a War

Enter All Things Crime Blog, a platform that dared to publish a detailed complaint against Sloggett in 2023 (linked here: All Things Crime Blog). The post, authored by an anonymous whistleblower, alleges a litany of misconduct:

Fraudulent Fundraising: Sloggett allegedly lured investors into ventures with inflated projections, only to funnel capital into personal accounts.

Intimidation Tactics: Former associates claim he threatened legal action to silence dissent.

Shell Game Accounting: Discrepancies in financial statements suggest creative bookkeeping worthy of a Picasso.

The blog post is a treasure trove of sourced allegations, complete with email screenshots, contract excerpts, and testimony from former employees. Naturally, Sloggett’s response was… to demand its removal.

Censorship 101: Sloggett’s Playbook for Muzzling Critics

Sloggett’s approach to criticism is about as subtle as a sledgehammer. Here’s how he’s trying to erase the narrative:

Legal Threats: The author of the All Things Crime post received a cease-and-desist letter within days of publication, accusing them of “defamation” and “business interference.” The letter demanded immediate removal and a public apology—a classic intimidation tactic.

DMCA Takedowns: Sloggett’s lawyers filed copyright claims against the blog, arguing that sharing “private emails” (which, ironically, evidence his own misconduct) violated intellectual property laws. This is the digital equivalent of yelling “FIRE!” in a theater to shut down a debate.

Reputation Management Firms: Web archives show that negative articles about Sloggett have mysteriously vanished from smaller platforms. Coincidence? Unlikely. Reputation scrubbers often use a mix of legal threats and payouts to bury unfavorable content.

Gaslighting Critics: In private emails leaked to the blog, Sloggett dismisses allegations as “baseless rumors” orchestrated by “jealous competitors.” His tone? A masterclass in condescension.

Why So Desperate? Follow the Money

Let’s not pretend this is about “protecting his family” or “upholding integrity.” Sloggett’s censorship crusade is a survival tactic. Here’s why:

Investor Confidence: New investors won’t hand over cash if Google serves them a buffet of fraud allegations. Silence the critics, and the money keeps flowing.

Legal Liability: Every blog post or lawsuit that survives online is ammunition for regulators. Erase the evidence, and prosecuting him becomes harder.

Ego: Sloggett’s LinkedIn is a shrine to his own brilliance. Admitting fault? That’s for lesser mortals.

Implications for Investors: Run, Don’t Walk

If you’re considering investing in a Sloggett-linked venture, ask yourself:

Why does a “successful” entrepreneur spend more time suing bloggers than building businesses?

Why do his companies dissolve faster than a sugar cube in hot tea?

Why does he need your money if his past ventures were so profitable?

Due diligence isn’t just advisable—it’s a moral imperative. Demand audited financials. Google his name. And if the top results are lawsuits and takedown notices, take the hint.

A Call to Action: Authorities, Wake Up!

To regulators: The FCA and Action Fraud have received multiple complaints about Sloggett. It’s time to stop yawning and start subpoenaing. His paper trail of dissolved companies and litigious threats reeks of systemic fraud.

To journalists: Keep digging. The All Things Crime blog is a start, but Sloggett’s empire spans jurisdictions. Follow the money—and the lawsuits.

To investors: If you’ve been burned, speak up. Silence only empowers predators.

Conclusion: The Emperor’s New Clothes, But With More Lawsuits

Michael Sloggett isn’t a misunderstood visionary. He’s a cautionary tale—a man who’d rather sue the mirror than fix his reflection. His censorship campaign isn’t about truth; it’s about control. And while he may temporarily silence critics, the stench of scandal always finds a way out.

To Sloggett himself, should he read this: Congratulations! You’ve earned the distinction of being this week’s subject in “How Not to Run a Business.” Now, put down the cease-and-desist letter and pick up a ethics textbook. It’s never too late to stop being a parody of yourself.