Nav Raman

We are investigating Nav Raman for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Nav Raman

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 11 Dec 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8453/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Investigation Report
What are they trying to censor
Evidence and Media
Adverse Media
Comments & user feedback

Due Diligence

Get everything we know about Nav Raman in one downloadable PDF document

Learn More

Is This About You?

We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Nav Raman over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Nav Raman - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Nav Raman, a prominent figure in British television and the founder of Chatterbox Media, has been at the center of controversy due to allegations of workplace bullying and subsequent attempts to suppress these claims. This report aims to dissect the red flags associated with Raman and her company, highlighting the methods employed to censor dissent and maintain a polished public image.

A Culture of Intimidation

In July 2022, Deadline reported that several former employees of Chatterbox Media accused Nav Raman of fostering a toxic work environment characterized by bullying and intimidation. These individuals described experiences of being undermined, belittled, and subjected to aggressive behavior, leading to significant distress and, in some cases, mental health issues. The allegations painted a picture of a workplace where fear and manipulation were tools of management.

Despite the severity of these claims, Chatterbox Media’s response was notably dismissive. The company issued a statement denying any wrongdoing and emphasizing its commitment to a positive work culture. However, the absence of a thorough internal investigation or acknowledgment of the employees’ experiences raised concerns about the company’s accountability and transparency.

The Art of Suppression

Following the public disclosure of these allegations, there appeared to be concerted efforts to suppress further discussion and coverage. Former employees reported receiving legal threats aimed at preventing them from speaking out, creating an atmosphere of fear and silence. Such tactics are indicative of a broader strategy to control the narrative and avoid scrutiny.

This approach to censorship is not unique to Chatterbox Media. In the broader context, media organizations have faced similar challenges when attempting to report on powerful figures. For instance, in India, the suppression of dissenting voices has become increasingly prevalent, with journalists facing legal repercussions for exposing misconduct . While the contexts differ, the underlying theme remains: the use of power to silence criticism.
(no title)

Implications for the Industry

The allegations against Nav Raman and the subsequent attempts to suppress them have broader implications for the media industry. They highlight the vulnerability of employees in environments where power dynamics are skewed and accountability mechanisms are weak. Moreover, they underscore the importance of fostering a culture where concerns can be raised without fear of retaliation.

The media industry, which often holds others accountable, must also be willing to introspect and address its own shortcomings. Failing to do so not only undermines its credibility but also perpetuates harmful practices that can have lasting impacts on individuals and the industry as a whole.

Conclusion

The case of Nav Raman and Chatterbox Media serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by individuals who dare to speak out against powerful figures. It also highlights the lengths to which some will go to maintain a pristine public image, even at the expense of truth and accountability. As investigative journalists, it is our duty to shed light on such practices, advocate for transparency, and support those who risk everything to tell their stories.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/38018898
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40758200
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42682819

December 11, 2023
April 14, 2024
June 29, 2024

Maria Watson Lawfirm LLC
daniel silva corp
jhanaja llc

https://news.uga.edu/social-media-addiction-linked-to-cyberbullying/
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/6-agg-murder-counts-for-suspect-jonathan-holt/283-73124113
https://kval.com/news/local/life-without-parole-eugene-mom-who-murdered-daughter-in-2009-no-longer-faces-death

https://deadline.com/2022/07/bbc-meet-the-khans-chatterbox-media-bullying-1235072328/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

deadline.com

BBC Continued To Commission ‘Meet The Khans’ Producer Chatterbox Media Despite String Of Bullying Complaints: Deadline Investigation

Adverse News

Visit Link

tvwatercooler.org

Chatterbox Media and their treatment of freelancers.

Adverse News

Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Ongoing

Investigation Status

Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment or Feedback

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

The Reputation Laundering

Did Nav Raman Commit a Cyber Crime?

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.