CyberCriminal.com

Netview Trading

We are investigating Netview Trading for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Netview Trading

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : March 30, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 6563/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 3 Apr 2025

Netview Trading
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Netview Trading in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Netview Trading over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Netview Trading - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Netview Trading presents itself as a promising gateway to lucrative investments, but beneath its polished facade lies a web of deceit, manipulation, and outright fraud. With an online presence designed to lure unsuspecting investors, the company thrives on misinformation, regulatory evasion, and a relentless effort to suppress the truth. While it claims to offer cutting-edge trading services, a deeper investigation reveals a disturbing pattern of unethical practices, withdrawal restrictions, and an alarming absence of regulatory oversight. If there’s one thing Netview Trading excels at, it’s creating an illusion of legitimacy while operating in the shadows.

A Facade of Legitimacy: The Luxembourg Lie

Netview Trading proudly flaunts a Luxembourg address, suggesting a European stronghold and, by implication, adherence to stringent EU financial regulations. However, this claim crumbles under scrutiny. The purported address is a mere smokescreen, with no tangible ties to any legitimate operations in Luxembourg. This deliberate misrepresentation is not just a minor oversight—it’s a calculated attempt to dupe investors into a false sense of security.

Regulatory Evasion: The Art of Operating in the Shadows

In the financial realm, regulation serves as the bedrock of trust and transparency. Legitimate entities proudly display their regulatory credentials, offering investors a semblance of security. Netview Trading, however, seems to have missed this memo. Their conspicuous absence from any reputable regulatory body’s registry is not just an oversight—it’s a deliberate maneuver. By sidestepping regulation, they operate with impunity, free from the prying eyes of oversight committees. This blatant evasion is a glaring red flag, signaling potential investors to tread cautiously.

The Web of Deception: A Digital Shell Game

A company’s online presence often serves as its digital storefront, offering insights into its operations, values, and legitimacy. Netview Trading’s website, however, is a masterclass in obfuscation. Essential details such as company history, leadership bios, and physical addresses are conspicuously absent. This lack of transparency isn’t just a minor oversight—it’s a strategic ploy to keep inquisitive minds at bay. After all, it’s challenging to hold a phantom accountable.

Client Testimonials: Echoes of Discontent

In the age of digital communication, client testimonials offer invaluable insights into a company’s operations. A cursory glance at online forums and review platforms reveals a chorus of discontented voices lamenting their experiences with Netview Trading. Complaints range from withdrawal issues and unresponsive customer service to allegations of outright fraud. While every company might face occasional criticism, the sheer volume and consistency of grievances against Netview Trading paint a damning picture.

Censorship and Information Suppression: Controlling the Narrative

In an era where information is power, Netview Trading appears to be on a relentless quest to control the narrative. Reports abound of negative reviews mysteriously disappearing from platforms, and whistleblowers facing undue pressure to retract their statements. This aggressive approach to information suppression is not the hallmark of a company with nothing to hide. On the contrary, it’s indicative of an entity desperate to keep its dubious dealings under wraps.

Investor Implications: A Cautionary Tale

For potential investors, Netview Trading serves as a cautionary tale. The allure of high returns and seamless trading experiences is overshadowed by the myriad red flags that permeate its operations. From regulatory evasion and opaque practices to aggressive information suppression, the signs are clear: this is not a vessel one should entrust with their financial aspirations.

Conclusion

In the intricate dance of online trading, due diligence is not just advisable—it’s imperative. Netview Trading’s operations, as illuminated through this investigation, reveal a company more invested in deception than delivering on its promises. Regulatory bodies must take heed, initiating thorough investigations to protect unsuspecting investors. Meanwhile, the trading community must remain vigilant, championing transparency and holding entities like Netview Trading accountable. In the end, the market’s integrity hinges on our collective commitment to exposing and eradicating such malfeasance.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50431705
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50431776
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50540474
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50542630
  • March 30, 2025
  • March 30, 2025
  • April 02, 2025
  • Максим Горюнов
  • Michael Wilson
  • Michael Wilson
  • Максим Горюнов
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-03-30-3
  • https://telegra.ph/Netviewtrading-httpnetviewtradingcom-lzhebroker-Otzyv-Telltrue-03-30-2
  • https://telegra.ph/Netview-Trading-04-02-3
  • https://www.wikifx.com/ru/dealer/6515188492.html
  • https://x.com/1TellTrue/status/1901994062086869180
  • https://vsyapravda.net/directories/finance/forex/netview-trading

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

wikifx

Warning: WikiFX rating is too low, stay away!

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

youtube

Netview Trading Review: NetviewTrading.com Scam Exposed! 🚨

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

youtube

Netview Trading reviews, netviewtrading.com review Scam Alert!

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login