CyberCriminal.com

Nguyen Quoc Anh

We are investigating Nguyen Quoc Anh for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Nguyen Quoc Anh

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 25 Aug 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2750/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 17 Mar 2025

Nguyen Quoc Anh
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Nguyen Quoc Anh in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Nguyen Quoc Anh over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Nguyen Quoc Anh - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Nguyen Quoc Anh, the former director of Bach Mai Hospital in Hanoi. His tenure, once emblematic of medical leadership, has been marred by allegations of corruption, fraud, and a desperate attempt to sanitize his digital footprint. This report exposes the red flags and adverse media associated with Nguyen Quoc Anh and scrutinizes his endeavors to suppress this damaging information.

The Scandal Unveiled: A Synopsis
Nguyen Quoc Anh’s fall from grace centers on a scandal involving the gross inflation of medical equipment prices. Investigations revealed that under his leadership, Bach Mai Hospital engaged in fraudulent procurement practices, notably inflating the prices of medical devices in collaboration with private companies. This scheme led to significant financial losses for both the hospital and its patients, undermining trust in Vietnam’s healthcare system.

The Fraudulent Scheme: A Closer Look
The crux of the scandal lies in the manipulation of procurement processes. Nguyen Quoc Anh and his associates allegedly bypassed standard tender procedures, favoring specific suppliers who provided kickbacks in return. For instance, leasing contracts for hospital equipment were signed with costs inflated by as much as 300%, placing an undue financial burden on the hospital and its patients. This exploitation not only drained public resources but also deepened societal inequities in healthcare access.

The Human Toll: Patients as Collateral Damage
The most egregious aspect of this fraud is its direct impact on patients. Many were unknowingly charged exorbitant fees for medical procedures utilizing overpriced equipment. For low-income families, these excessive costs often meant forgoing essential treatments, further marginalizing the vulnerable and eroding public trust in healthcare institutions.

A Desperate Attempt at Reputation Management
In the aftermath of his conviction, Nguyen Quoc Anh embarked on a campaign to cleanse his online reputation. This involved hiring dubious ‘reputation management’ agencies that employed unethical tactics to suppress negative information. One such tactic was the misuse of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown process. By creating backdated articles on fake news sites, these agencies falsely claimed copyright infringement, leading to the removal of legitimate negative content from search results.

The Modus Operandi: Deception and Fraud
These reputation agencies operate by copying negative content and posting it on fabricated news sites under false authorship, assigning backdated publication dates. They then file DMCA notices, alleging that the original articles are infringing on their ‘original’ content. This deceptive practice manipulates the system, resulting in the takedown of authentic articles and the preservation of the client’s sanitized online presence.

The Streisand Effect: A Backfire
Ironically, Nguyen Quoc Anh’s attempts to suppress negative information have drawn more attention to his misdeeds. This phenomenon, known as the Streisand Effect, occurs when efforts to hide information only serve to publicize it further. Investigative reports have highlighted his censorship attempts, ensuring that his unethical actions remain in the public eye.

Legal and Ethical Implications
The misuse of the DMCA takedown process not only undermines the integrity of copyright law but also raises serious ethical concerns. Submitting fraudulent notices constitutes perjury, yet enforcement against such violations remains lax. This lack of accountability emboldens individuals like Nguyen Quoc Anh to exploit legal mechanisms for personal gain, further eroding public trust in regulatory systems.

A Call to Action: Safeguarding Integrity
The case of Nguyen Quoc Anh underscores the need for robust mechanisms to protect the integrity of information and hold individuals accountable for unethical practices. It is imperative for authorities to scrutinize and regulate reputation management practices, ensuring they do not infringe upon the public’s right to information. Additionally, strengthening enforcement against the misuse of legal processes like the DMCA is crucial in deterring such fraudulent activities.

Conclusion: Vigilance Against Deception
Nguyen Quoc Anh’s trajectory from a respected medical professional to a figure embroiled in corruption and deceit serves as a cautionary tale. His attempts to rewrite history through unethical means highlight the lengths to which individuals may go to preserve their reputation. As custodians of information, we must remain vigilant against such deception, ensuring that truth prevails and that those who engage in malpractice are held accountable.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35683497
  • August 25, 2023
  • Jimmy Mathew
  • https://www.tumblr.com/grnews/725242975838502912/former-hanoi-hospital-director-arrested-in-ongoing
  • https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/former-hanoi-hospital-director-arrested-in-ongoing-fraud-case-4167546.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

vnexpress

Former Hanoi hospital director arrested in ongoing fraud case

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

intelligenceline

Nguyen Quoc Anh’s Crime Report

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

financescam

Nguyen Quoc Anh is marked as Criminal

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login