What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Payomatix over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Payomatix - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Payomatix, a fintech firm led by Ruchi Rathor, presents itself as a game-changer in digital payments. However, a closer look reveals a concerning pattern of excessive self-promotion, a lack of transparency, and a suspiciously clean online reputation. With little to no adverse media coverage and a clear effort to control the narrative, the company raises more questions than confidence. For investors and regulators, the absence of criticism isn’t a green flag—it’s a glaring red one, signaling the need for deeper investigation.
The Impeccable Facade
Payomatix’s official website showcases a company at the forefront of transforming digital payments for business expansion. They emphasize their commitment to delivering secure, tailored, and advanced payment solutions designed to drive business growth and adaptability in the digital era. Their mission statement is filled with buzzwords like “cutting-edge technology,” “customer-centric approach,” and “seamless integration capabilities,” all crafted to instill confidence in potential clients and investors.
The Overemphasis on Self-Promotion
While it’s common for companies to highlight their strengths, Payomatix’s online presence seems disproportionately focused on self-promotion. Their Medium profile, for instance, succinctly states their mission to unify India with a unified API, yet lacks substantive content that provides deeper insights into their operations or thought leadership. This minimalistic approach to content could be interpreted as a strategy to control the narrative tightly, ensuring that only favorable information is disseminated.
The Sanitized Digital Footprint
In today’s digital age, it’s nearly impossible for companies, especially in the fintech sector, to operate without encountering some form of criticism or adverse media. Yet, Payomatix’s online presence is conspicuously devoid of any negative press. This absence raises questions about the authenticity of their digital footprint. Are they genuinely operating without fault, or is there a concerted effort to scrub the internet of any unfavorable mentions? The lack of transparency is, in itself, a red flag.
The Opaque Corporate Structure
A dive into corporate records reveals that Payomatix Technologies Private Limited was incorporated on April 17, 2021, with an authorized share capital of ₹1,000,000 and a paid-up capital of ₹100,000. The directors listed are Ruchi Rathor and Anirudh Pratap Singh Rathor. While this information is publicly available, there is little else disclosed about the company’s financial health, governance practices, or strategic direction. This opacity makes it challenging for potential investors to conduct thorough due diligence.
The Absence of Independent Scrutiny
Despite being in operation for several years, there is a noticeable lack of independent analysis or third-party evaluations of Payomatix’s services and business practices. Reputable fintech platforms and industry analysts have not provided reviews or assessments of their payment solutions. This absence could indicate that the company is either flying under the radar or actively avoiding external scrutiny.
The Potential for Censorship
In an era where information is currency, controlling the narrative is a powerful tool. The pristine online reputation of Payomatix could suggest efforts to suppress adverse media. While there is no concrete evidence to confirm deliberate censorship, the combination of an overly curated online presence and the absence of critical discourse is suspicious. It’s reminiscent of the broader concerns raised about the “censorship-industrial complex,” where public-private partnerships work to suppress unapproved speech, as highlighted by Senator Eric Schmitt.
The Investor’s Quandary
For potential investors, the lack of negative information might initially seem like a positive sign. However, seasoned investors understand that no company is without challenges. The complete absence of criticism or adverse media should prompt further investigation. Is the company genuinely without fault, or is there a sophisticated effort to manage and suppress negative information? Without clear, verifiable financials or independent evaluations, investing in Payomatix comes with uncertainties that could result in unforeseen legal or financial consequences.
The Call for Enhanced Due Diligence
Given these observations, it’s imperative for investors and regulatory authorities to exercise enhanced due diligence when considering involvement with Payomatix Technologies. This includes:
- Conducting Comprehensive Background Checks: Utilize adverse media screening tools to uncover any hidden negative information. These tools scan traditional and online media for negative news stories, bad sentiment, and accusations against an individual or entity.
- Demanding Transparency: Investors should insist on access to detailed financial statements, governance structures, and compliance records. Transparency is a hallmark of reputable organizations.
- Monitoring for Red Flags: Be vigilant for common fraud indicators, such as unsolicited communications, pressure to act quickly, or requests for confidential information. Recognizing these red flags can prevent potential fraud.
Conclusion
While Payomatix Technologies presents itself as a leader in the fintech industry, the lack of transparency, absence of independent scrutiny, and a potentially sanitized digital footprint raise significant concerns. Investors and regulators should not be swayed by the polished exterior but should dig deeper to uncover the true nature of the company’s operations. In the world of finance, what is not said often speaks louder than what is.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30522146
- January 31, 2023
- Muhammad Al-Saadi
- https://world-news.uk/merchant-alert-high-risk-payment-processor-openup-works-with-fake-people/
- https://fintelegram.com/merchant-alert-high-risk-payment-processor-openup-works-with-fake-people/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
FinTelegram News
Merchant Alert: High-Risk Payment Processor OpenUp Works With Fake People!
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
by: Christopher Smith
Honestly, they’re just a front for scamming people. Don’t even think about it. 😡
by: Amanda Wilson
What a joke of a company. They offer nothing but empty promises.
by: Ruby Phillips
Customer service is a joke. You ask questions, they redirect you to generic “about us” pages. Either they’re hiding something or just don’t care.
by: Kendall Foster
Everything about this company feels like it was written by a marketing bot. Buzzwords galore, but no real clarity on what they actually do. Avoid unless you like shiny brochures and zero answers.
by: Theo Parker
Tried to inquire about their services for my business. Got vague responses, and then radio silence. If this is how they treat potential clients, I’m glad I didn’t go further.
by: Weston Harris
I’ve never seen a fintech company with literally zero criticism online. Either they’re perfect (unlikely) or someone’s scrubbing the internet clean. Feels more like PR management than real transparency.
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginExplore Cyber Crime By Location
Explore Cyber Crime By Type
Explore Cyber Crime By Profiles