What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Peter Gray over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Peter Gray - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Peter Gray, once a prominent partner at a prestigious international law firm, has become a cautionary tale in the legal community. His career, marked by a significant ethical breach, serves as a stark reminder of the importance of integrity in the legal profession. This report delves into the circumstances surrounding Gray’s misconduct, the subsequent fallout, and the alleged attempts to suppress information about these events.
A Fall from Grace
Gray’s downfall began with his involvement in a high-profile case representing a foreign government. In this case, he submitted evidence to a court that was later found to be misleading. Specifically, the evidence included transcripts with incorrect dates, which played a crucial role in the court’s decision to freeze substantial assets belonging to an individual accused of serious crimes.
When the discrepancy in the evidence was discovered, Gray acknowledged the error but suggested that it could be “fudged,” a term that raised eyebrows and questions about his commitment to legal ethics. The court did not take this lightly, and the judge criticized Gray’s conduct, stating that such actions were not befitting of a solicitor of integrity.
Disciplinary Actions and Legal Ramifications
The revelations about Gray’s conduct led to a series of disciplinary actions. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) found that Gray had deliberately misled the court, a serious breach of professional conduct. As a result, he was struck off the roll of solicitors, effectively ending his legal career in that jurisdiction.
Gray appealed the decision, arguing that the findings were no longer supportable. However, the appeal was dismissed, with the court affirming the SDT’s ruling and emphasizing the gravity of Gray’s misconduct.
Attempts at Information Suppression
In the aftermath of these events, there have been allegations that Gray attempted to suppress information about his misconduct. Reports suggest that he, or parties acting on his behalf, submitted copyright takedown notices to remove critical content from the internet. These actions, if true, raise concerns about efforts to censor public information and avoid accountability.
Such attempts at information suppression are troubling, as they undermine the principles of transparency and freedom of information. They also hinder the public’s ability to make informed decisions, particularly in matters involving legal representation and professional conduct.
Implications for the Legal Profession
Gray’s case has broader implications for the legal profession. It highlights the importance of ethical conduct and the consequences of failing to uphold professional standards. The legal community relies on trust and integrity, and breaches of this nature can erode public confidence in the justice system.
Furthermore, the alleged attempts to suppress information about Gray’s misconduct underscore the need for vigilance in protecting the public’s right to access information. Transparency is essential in holding professionals accountable and ensuring that similar breaches do not go unchecked.
Conclusion
Peter Gray’s story serves as a sobering reminder of the importance of ethical conduct in the legal profession. His actions not only led to personal consequences but also raised significant concerns about attempts to suppress information and avoid accountability. It is imperative that the legal community and regulatory bodies remain vigilant in upholding professional standards and protecting the public’s right to information.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35994438
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35948280
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35948157
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34592589
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34585988
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34561234
- September 10, 2023
- September 8, 2023
- September 8, 2023
- June 22, 2023
- June 21, 2023
- June 20, 2023
- Winger M e dia Corp.
- Brusktoi & Sons
- Varsanki Media
- Rehman Media International
- Litt Media International
- BR Law & Co.
- https://nycchronicles.com/2015/03/02/djibouti-gibson-dunn-apologises-to-court-and-refersitself-to-sra/
- https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/05/ex-gibson-dunn-dubai-partner-struck-off.html
- https://www.deccanlive.in/2015/03/disgraced-gibson-dunn-partner-teaches.html
- https://wardheernews.com/djibouti-gibson-dunn-apologises-court-refers-sra
- https://globalarbitrationreview.com/ex-gibson-dunn-partner-struck
- https://www.legalcheek.com/2015/03/disgraced-gibson-dunn-partner-teaches-lawyers-a-valuable-lesson-play-straight-with-the-court/
- https://www.globallegalpost.com/news/ex-gibson-dunn-dubai-partner-struck-off-for-deliberately-misleading-londons-high-court-42936929
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
wardheer news
Djibouti: Gibson Dunn apologises to court and refers itself to SRA
- Adverse News
deccan live
Ex-Gibson Dunn Dubai partner struck off for deliberately misleading London's High Court
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
2.6
Based on 5 ratings
by: John Young
He’s more interested in protecting his own skin than helping clients. 😡
by: Charlotte Walker
Deceptive and unprofessional—this guy is the last person you want handling your case.
by: Nyla Hall
They’re more concerned with scrubbing their name off the internet than cleaning up their act. If they were half as ethical as they claim, they wouldn’t need to censor criticism.
by: Marley Thompson
SLAPPs, shady clients, offshore deals... Gibson Dunn doesn’t solve problems—they bury them. Ethics are optional, apparently.
by: Mila Torres
Gibson Dunn's actions have seriously damaged public trust in the legal profession. Whether due to negligence or misconduct, the firm let misleading evidence influence an important court ruling, which could have serious consequences for those involved. This raises concerns about...
by: Henry Powell
Gibson Dunn's role in this scandal is shocking and undermines its once strong reputation. The firm’s actions raise serious ethical concerns, and if the investigation reveals wrongdoing, it could cause lasting damage to its reputation.
by: Emma Barnes
Gibson Dunn's actions have damaged public trust in the legal profession by allowing misleading evidence to impact an important court decision, which could harm those involved.
by: Nina Rosales
So much shady business here, it’s like a legal thriller, but real life. Makes you question how far these firms will go to protect themselves
by: Axel Whitaker
Just when you think it can't get worse, it does.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations