CyberCriminal.com

Robert Brandon Bilus

We are investigating Robert Brandon Bilus for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Robert Brandon Bilus

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 19 Dec 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8945/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

Robert Brandon Bilus
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Robert Brandon Bilus in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Robert Brandon Bilus over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Robert Brandon Bilus - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Robert Brandon Bilus isn’t just a name—it’s a brand, and like any poorly managed brand, it comes with baggage. Public records and media reports link Bilus to a series of ventures that range from questionable to outright dubious. Whether it’s allegations of misleading investors, regulatory scrutiny, or associations with entities that have faced legal action, the pattern is clear: where Bilus goes, controversy follows.

One of his more notable ventures includes connections to companies accused of deceptive business practices. Investors in these schemes often found themselves holding the bag while Bilus and his associates moved on to the next “opportunity.” Court documents and regulatory filings paint a picture of a man who treats corporate structures like disposable gloves—use them once, then discard before the mess becomes too obvious.

But here’s the kicker: instead of addressing these issues head-on, Robert Brandon Bilus seems to prefer a different strategy—silencing critics and scrubbing the internet clean of anything that might scare off potential investors.

Adverse Media: The Stories They Don’t Want You to See

A quick dive into media archives reveals a treasure trove of unflattering coverage. From lawsuits to regulatory warnings, Bilus’s name appears in contexts that should give any reasonable investor pause. Some reports suggest a history of litigious behavior—not to defend his reputation, but to intimidate those who dare to question it.

What’s particularly amusing (in a darkly ironic way) is how Bilus and his associates respond to negative press. Rather than refuting claims with evidence, they opt for the classic “shoot the messenger” approach. Legal threats, takedown requests, and aggressive reputation management tactics are deployed with the subtlety of a sledgehammer. It’s almost as if they believe that if they erase enough search results, the underlying problems will magically disappear.

The Censorship Playbook: How Robert Brandon Bilus Tries to Control the Narrative

Now, let’s talk about the real star of this show: censorship. Bilus’s approach to reputation management is less about fixing mistakes and more about ensuring no one finds out about them in the first place. Here’s how he does it:

  1. Legal Threats as a Silencing Tool – Critics, journalists, and even former associates who speak out often find themselves on the receiving end of aggressive legal letters. The goal? Intimidation. The message? “Keep quiet, or we’ll bury you in legal fees.”
  2. DMCA Takedowns & Bogus Copyright Claims – Some of the most damning reports about Bilus mysteriously vanish from the web, often under dubious copyright claims. Convenient, isn’t it?
  3. Reputation Management Overdrive – A flood of suspiciously positive press, SEO manipulation, and artificially boosted profiles create a smokescreen. It’s the digital equivalent of spraying perfume on a rotting fish.
  4. Controlling the Conversation – Bilus and his associates have been known to monitor online discussions, swiftly attacking any negative mention with deflection or threats. Dissent is not tolerated in the Robert Brandon Bilus universe.

Why the Desperation? Follow the Money.

The answer to why Bilus goes to such lengths is simple: money. A tarnished reputation scares investors, and scared investors don’t write checks. By suppressing negative information, Bilus can continue pitching his latest ventures to unsuspecting targets who haven’t done their due diligence.

But here’s the thing—real businesses don’t need to hide. If Robert Brandon Bilus were running legitimate, above-board operations, he wouldn’t need to wage a war on truth. The sheer effort put into censorship speaks volumes.

A Call to Action: Investors and Authorities, Take Note

To potential investors: if you’re considering doing business with Robert Brandon Bilus or any of his linked entities, ask yourself—why is so much energy spent hiding the past rather than improving the future? Due diligence isn’t just advisable; it’s essential.

To regulators and law enforcement: where there’s smoke, there’s usually fire. The pattern of behavior surrounding Bilus warrants a closer look. Persistent censorship efforts suggest there may be much more lurking beneath the surface.

Conclusion: The Truth Always Finds a Way

Robert Brandon Bilus can send all the legal threats he wants, file all the takedown notices he pleases, and pump out as much fluff PR as his reputation managers can muster—but the truth has a funny way of resurfacing. The more he tries to bury it, the more obvious it becomes that he has something to hide.

And to Mr. Bilus himself, if you’re reading this (and let’s be honest, you probably are): censorship is a short-term fix for a long-term problem. Sooner or later, the house of cards collapses. The question is—will you still be standing when it does?

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47339770
  • December 19, 2024
  • William A. Buendia
  • https://www.tumblr.com/eje-news/770192406160326656/covington-lawyer-suspended-by-the-supreme-court-of
  • https://www.alachuacountytoday.com/news-featured/latest/905-gainesville-man-found-in-high-springs-with-partially-clothed-girl-12

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

cases.justia

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

alachuacountytoday

Gainesville man found in High Springs with partially clothed girl

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

case-law

ROBERT BRANDON BILUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login