CyberCriminal.com

Stanley Gabart

We are investigating Stanley Gabart for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Stanley Gabart

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 18 February 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3200/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 March 2025

Stanley Gabart
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Stanley Gabart in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Stanley Gabart over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Stanley Gabart - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Stanley Gabart, a name that, at first glance, might not ring alarm bells. However, as I peeled back the layers, a pattern of deceit, manipulation, and a desperate attempt to bury the truth emerged—painting a portrait of a man investors should approach with extreme caution.

A History Marred by Fraud

Our journey begins in the sun-soaked streets of Miami, circa 2010. The FBI’s Miami Division released a statement detailing charges against one Stanley Gabart. The allegations? Conspiracy to commit bank fraud and making false statements on loan applications to major financial institutions, including Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase. Gabart, along with his co-conspirators, allegedly falsified employment records, inflated incomes, and misrepresented assets to secure loans for properties in Wellington, Lake Worth, and Miami Beach, Florida. If convicted, he faced up to 30 years in prison for each count.

One would think such serious charges would deter future misconduct. Yet, Gabart’s subsequent endeavors suggest otherwise.

The Glamorous Facade

Fast forward to April 27, 2024. The Pier Sixty-Six Marina in Fort Lauderdale buzzed with excitement as the yacht “She’s A 10too” was unveiled. Among the attendees were Stanley and Jihan Gabart, smiling for the cameras, exuding an air of success and legitimacy.

But as the champagne flowed and accolades were exchanged, discerning eyes couldn’t help but wonder: Was this opulence built on a foundation of integrity or deceit?

Dabbling in the Entertainment Industry

Gabart’s ventures aren’t confined to real estate and luxury yachts. He has also dipped his toes into the music industry. A press release from Audible Treats mentions Stanley Gabart as part of rapper Sexyy’s management team. The release highlights Gabart’s recognition of Sexyy’s influence in the female rap scene and his eagerness to support her burgeoning career.

While involvement in the entertainment sector isn’t inherently dubious, it’s essential to scrutinize the intentions and ethics of those at the helm. Given Gabart’s checkered past, one must question the authenticity of his support and the potential implications for the artists under his wing.

The Investor’s Dilemma

For potential investors, the allure of partnering with a seemingly successful entrepreneur can be tempting. However, it’s imperative to look beyond the polished exterior. Gabart’s history is riddled with deceit, and his relentless efforts to conceal this fact should serve as glaring red flags.

Investing isn’t merely about the potential for returns; it’s about trust. Can one, in good conscience, entrust their capital to an individual with a documented history of fraud and a penchant for obfuscation?

A Call to Action for Authorities

While the past cannot be undone, the future can be safeguarded. Regulatory bodies and law enforcement agencies must remain vigilant. Gabart’s attempts to censor information and reinvent his public persona are not just efforts at personal redemption—they pose a tangible threat to unsuspecting investors and the integrity of various industries.

Continuous monitoring, thorough investigations, and, where necessary, legal action are essential to prevent history from repeating itself. The public relies on these institutions to act as gatekeepers, ensuring that individuals like Gabart are held accountable and that their attempts at deception are thwarted.

Conclusion

Stanley Gabart’s journey is a cautionary tale of how appearances can be deceiving. Behind the yachts, the celebrity associations, and the business ventures lies a history of fraud and manipulation. His persistent efforts to censor this information only further highlight his unwillingness to accept responsibility and change.

 

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49612858
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49601097
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49171396
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50432362
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50513029
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50488403
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50452057
  • 5 March 2025
  • 5 March 2025
  • 18 February 2025
  •  
  • April 01, 2025
  • March 31, 2025
  • March 30, 2025
  • Chola LLC
  • Chola LLC
  • Vacambi International
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • Cameron International Ltd.
  • Armen Media Inc.
  • https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/fls/PressReleases/2010/101101-03.html
  • https://mormonfind.com/2010/03/05/four-plead-guilty-to-fraud-in-versailles-mortgage-scheme/
  • https://www.telegram.com/story/news/local/north/2012/07/30/community-struggles-to-understand-apparent/49485917007/https://www.portlandtribune.com/news/four-arrested-for-july-2012-murder/article_959884d7-330f-52b5-994f-8317dbdf0a64.html
  • https://www.khou.com/article/news/illinois-prosecutor-wrong-man-convicted-of-1957-murder-of-7-year-old-girl/285-[REDACTED]
  • https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2019/06/28/trial-david-dooley-convicted-killing-michelle-mockbee-featured-dateline/1597910001/
  • https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/crime/2010/11/01/four-plead-guilty-to-fraud/7584341007

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

palmbeachpost.com

Four plead guilty to fraud in Versailles mortgage scheme

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

fbi.gov

Miami Man Charged in Palm Beach Mortgage Fraud Scam

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

mortgagefraudblog.com

Florida Man Charged Making False Statements to Lenders

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login