CyberCriminal.com

Timothy Hornibrook

We are investigating Timothy Hornibrook for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Timothy Hornibrook

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 20 Dec 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7543/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Timothy Hornibrook
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Timothy Hornibrook in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Timothy Hornibrook over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Timothy Hornibrook - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Timothy Hornibrook stands out—a narrative woven with deception, regulatory rebuke, and a desperate attempt to maintain a veneer of respectability. Let’s delve into the intricacies of Hornibrook’s career, his fall from grace, and the lessons it imparts to discerning investors.

The Rise: A Prominent Figure in Agribusiness Investment

Timothy Hornibrook carved a niche for himself in the realm of agribusiness investment. Based in Sydney, he analyzed global agricultural commodities, focusing on assessing risk-reward characteristics to determine their suitability for institutional investment. His leadership in pioneering funds targeting the Australian cattle and sheep production industry capitalized on the global surge in protein consumption.

The Fall: Fabricated Entities and Regulatory Sanctions

However, beneath this polished exterior lurked unethical practices that would eventually lead to his undoing. In a bid to extract confidential information from competitors, Hornibrook, along with colleagues, established a fictitious family office—a private investment firm representing affluent families. This sham entity was used to solicit sensitive data under false pretenses, a maneuver that blatantly contravened financial service laws.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) took decisive action against Hornibrook’s deceitful conduct. In February 2016, he was banned from providing financial services for six years, a sanction that underscored the severity of his misconduct. ASIC’s investigation revealed that Hornibrook’s actions not only breached legal standards but also eroded trust within the financial services industry.

The Aftermath: Attempts at Reinvention

Post-ban, Hornibrook’s digital footprint suggests attempts to rebrand and distance himself from past transgressions. His LinkedIn profile highlights his educational background, noting that he began his studies at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, where he pursued a Bachelor of Arts degree. Additionally, he maintains a presence on platforms like Instagram and Twitter, where he shares personal interests and professional insights.

Implications for Investors: The Imperative of Due Diligence

The narrative of Timothy Hornibrook serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of due diligence for investors. Aligning with individuals or entities that engage in deceptive practices not only poses financial risks but also threatens reputational integrity. Hornibrook’s case underscores the necessity for investors to:

  • Verify Credentials: Scrutinize the backgrounds of fund managers and executives to ensure their professional histories are devoid of unethical conduct.

  • Assess Transparency: Engage with firms that maintain clear and honest communication channels, eschewing those that resort to subterfuge.

  • Monitor Regulatory Actions: Stay informed about sanctions and bans imposed by regulatory bodies, as these often signal deeper issues within an organization.

A Call to Action: Upholding Integrity in Financial Services

Regulatory bodies and industry stakeholders must remain vigilant in identifying and sanctioning unethical behavior. Hornibrook’s actions—fabricating entities to deceive competitors and extracting confidential information under false pretenses—warrant continued scrutiny. Such conduct undermines the foundational trust upon which financial systems are built.

Conclusion: Lessons from Hornibrook’s Downfall

Timothy Hornibrook’s trajectory—from a respected agribusiness investment professional to a disgraced figure banned from financial services—illuminates the perils of unethical conduct. His story serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing that deception may yield short-term gains but ultimately leads to long-term repercussions. For investors and professionals alike, Hornibrook’s downfall reinforces the timeless adage: integrity is paramount, and without it, the edifice of success is but a house of cards waiting to collapse.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47369820
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50396734
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50295293
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50365041
  • December 20, 2024
  • March 29, 2025
  • March 26, 2025
  •  
  • Jesami Josh
  • Sherry Peterson
  • Liam Mark
  • Ethnic sam
  • https://www.tumblr.com/24asia-news-press/770445540717723648/australian-regulator-punishes-former-advisor-over
  • https://www.tumblr.com/investment-newsscam/777797904015523840/ex-macquarie-funds-manager-banned
  • https://www.tumblr.com/scamalert24/778701824492519424/asic-bans-former-director-manager-of-macquarie
  • https://www.wealthbriefingasia.com/article.php/Australian-Regulator-Punishes-Former-Advisor-Over-Fake-Family-Office-Scam
  • https://www.urban.com.au/news/asic-bans-former-director-manager-of-macquarie-agricultural-funds-management
  • https://www.moneymanagement.com.au/news/funds-management/ex-macquarie-funds-manager-banned

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

smh.com

Tim Hornibrook, Ex-Macquarie Director, Hit with ASIC Ban Over Fake Email Scheme

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

moneymanagement.com

Former Macquarie Agricultural Funds Management Director Banned from Financial Services for Six Years

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

adelaidenow.com

ASIC bans Macquarie unit ex-manager

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login