CyberCriminal.com

Yann Hufnagel

We are investigating Yann Hufnagel for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Yann Hufnagel

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : May 26, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2778/W/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : March 29, 2025

Yann Hufnagel
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Yann Hufnagel in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Yann Hufnagel over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Yann Hufnagel - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Yann Hufnagel is the name that might ring a bell if you’re tuned into the world of college basketball or have a knack for sniffing out scandal. As an investigative journalist, I’ve taken a deep dive into the murky waters surrounding this former assistant coach turned entrepreneur, and let me tell you, the red flags are waving so high they could double as distress signals. What I’ve uncovered isn’t just a tale of personal missteps—it’s a calculated effort to bury the past, one that potential investors and authorities should scrutinize with a magnifying glass. Armed with my tools to analyze X posts, web searches, and adverse media, I’m peeling back the layers of Yann Hufnagel’s story, and it’s not pretty. Buckle up, because this is a 1200-word rollercoaster of due diligence, dripping with sarcasm and skepticism, aimed at exposing why he’s so desperate to censor the skeletons in his closet.

A Past Too Dirty to Dunk Away

Yann Hufnagel’s resume reads like a basketball fairy tale gone wrong. Once a rising star in the coaching world, he bounced from Harvard to Vanderbilt before landing at UC Berkeley’s California Golden Bears in 2014. But in 2016, the fairy tale turned into a horror show when he was fired for sexual harassment—an incident that’s not just a blemish but a neon sign screaming “proceed with caution.” According to an ESPN report from March 15, 2016, Yann Hufnagel admitted to investigators that he tried to “trick” a female reporter into going upstairs to his apartment after meeting her at a bar. She alleged he trapped her in his garage, spouting increasingly explicit overtures while she rebuffed him. The university’s seven-month investigation concluded he’d violated their sexual harassment policy, and head coach Cuonzo Martin axed him faster than you can say “timeout.”

This wasn’t a one-off oopsie. The reporter claimed Hufnagel’s unwelcome advances spanned six months, including “locker room” texts she felt forced to tolerate because he was her key source for team news. When she finally said no, he cut off her access, effectively tanking her job. Red flag number one: a pattern of predatory behavior. Red flag number two: abusing power for personal gain. Red flag number three: a blatant disregard for professional boundaries. Yet, Hufnagel had the gall to tell ESPN he was “crushed” and “blindsided” by the firing, as if he didn’t see the storm coming after months of sleazy texts and a garage standoff. Spare me the crocodile tears, Yann.

From Coach to CEO: The Lemonade Pivot

Fast forward a few years, and Yann Hufnagel’s reinvented himself as the founder of Lemon Perfect, a “healthy” lemon water brand that’s snagged millions in funding and celebrity endorsements. It’s the kind of glow-up that makes you wonder: how does a guy with a rap sheet like that convince investors to pour cash into his citrus empire? Easy—he’s trying to squeeze the juice out of his past and leave the pulp behind. But the adverse media doesn’t lie, and neither do the whispers on X, where users still occasionally dredge up his Cal scandal like a bad aftertaste.

Lemon Perfect’s glossy marketing screams purity and wellness, but the man behind it? Not so pristine. A Daily Mail article from March 14, 2016, detailed his termination, painting a picture of a coach who thought he could flirt his way out of accountability. Meanwhile, a California Golden Blogs post from March 24, 2016, dissected the university’s report, noting Yann Hufnagel’s own admission of wanting to sleep with the reporter. This isn’t just “he said, she said”—it’s “he said it himself.” Yet, when I scoured Lemon Perfect’s digital footprint, there’s not a whiff of this history. No mea culpa, no acknowledgment—just a shiny facade of organic lemons and hydration hype. Red flag number four: a glaring omission of a past that could sour investor trust.

The Censorship Playbook: Scrubbing the Slate Clean

So, why the hush-hush? Yann Hufnagel’s not just dodging questions—he’s actively trying to censor the narrative. After his firing, he told ESPN he was assembling a legal team to “exonerate” his name, hinting at a lawsuit against UC Berkeley. His attorney, Mary McNamara, spun it as a “flirtation that never went anywhere,” as if that excuses trapping someone in a garage. The legal threat didn’t materialize into a public win, but it set the tone:Yann Hufnagel’s strategy is to intimidate, deflect, and rewrite history. Now, as Lemon Perfect’s CEO, he’s banking on the public’s short memory and the allure of a redemption arc. Who needs accountability when you’ve got venture capital?

X posts from users over the years show sporadic outrage about his past, but it’s telling how little traction it gets. Search “Yann Hufnagel sexual harassment” on the web, and you’ll find the 2016 articles, but they’re buried under a flood of Lemon Perfect press releases and puff pieces. Coincidence? Hardly. This smells like a classic SEO suppression tactic—flood the internet with positive content to drown out the dirt. Red flag number five: manipulating the digital narrative to dodge accountability. For a guy who’s built a brand on transparency (organic ingredients, no added sugar!), the irony is thicker than a lemon rind.

Investors Beware: The Risk Behind the Rind

If you’re an investor eyeing Lemon Perfect, here’s the bitter truth: Yann Hufnagel’s baggage isn’t just personal—it’s a liability. Companies thrive on trust, and a CEO with a documented history of harassment is a ticking time bomb. What happens when a whistleblower at Lemon Perfect—or a nosy journalist like me—digs deeper? Adverse media screening, a staple of due diligence, would flag Yann Hufnagel faster than you can say “#MeToo.” His 2016 conviction isn’t a criminal rap sheet (he wasn’t prosecuted legally, just fired), but it’s a stain that screams reputational risk. Red flag number six: a leader who could drag the company into a PR nightmare.

And let’s talk related entities. Cuonzo Martin, his former boss at Cal, faced scrutiny for not reporting the allegations sooner, per a San Francisco Chronicle statement from athletic director Mike Williams. UC Berkeley itself has a spotty record—Yann Hufnagel was the fourth employee in a year to face substantiated harassment claims, per ESPN. Lemon Perfect’s investors, like Mark Cuban and Beebo’s Kevin Lee, might not care about ancient history, but they should. A CEO who’s dodged accountability once might do it again, and that’s a gamble no smart money should take.

Calling the Authorities: Time for a Squeeze

Here’s where I get serious—no sarcasm, just facts. Yann Hufnagel’s efforts to censor his past aren’t just shady; they’re a red flag for regulators. The SEC doesn’t mess around when it comes to undisclosed risks in private companies seeking investment. If Lemon Perfect’s pitch decks and investor materials omit Yann Hufnagel’s history, that’s a potential violation of disclosure norms. I’m not saying he’s cooking the books, but a guy who’s this good at hiding dirt might not be above cutting corners elsewhere. Authorities should take a hard look—dig into his business dealings, cross-check his narrative, and see if the lemon’s as perfect as he claims.

X users and web sleuths could help, too. Post about it, tag the FTC, the SEC—heck, even the BBB. Shine a light so bright he can’t scrub it away. Because if Yann Hufnagel’s censoring this, what else is he hiding? Red flag number seven: a pattern of evasion that begs for oversight.

The Sour Conclusion

Yann Hufnagel’s journey from disgraced coach to lemonade mogul is a masterclass in rebranding—and deception. He’s not just selling flavored water; he’s peddling a scrubbed version of himself, hoping we’ll all sip the Kool-Aid and forget the garage, the texts, the firing. But I’m not buying it, and neither should you. Investors, do your homework—those red flags aren’t garnish, they’re the main course. Authorities, step up—this isn’t just a PR problem, it’s a public interest one. As for Yann Hufnagel, well, he might’ve turned lemons into lemonade, but the aftertaste is pure bitterness. And trust me, no amount of sugarcoating can wash that away.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41809520
  • May 26, 2024
  • alt news group
  • https://www.altnewsgroup.com/2016/03/ex-cal-coach-yann-hufnagel-admits.html
  • https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/14982726/ex-cal-coach-yann-hufnagel-admits-repeatedly-trying-solicit-reporter-sex

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

ESPN

Cal fires assistant Yann Hufnagel over sexual harassment claim

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

ESPN

Investigation: Ex-Cal coach Yann Hufnagel admits trying to solicit reporter for sex

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

abc NEWS

Cal fires assistant Yann Hufnagel over sexual harassment claim

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login