CyberCriminal.com

Fabian Pietsch

We are investigating Fabian Pietsch for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

Person Name : Fabian Pietsch

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 05 Nov 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2750/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 10 Mar 2025

Fabian Pietsch
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Fabian Pietsch in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Fabian Pietsch over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Fabian Pietsch - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

In the labyrinthine world of high-ticket sales, one name has been echoing through the corridors with increasing frequency is Fabian Pietsch. Touted as a maestro of “closing”—the art of sealing lucrative deals over the phone—Pietsch has positioned himself as a beacon for those seeking financial liberation through remote work. His “Closing System” promises not just a skill set but a transformative journey toward economic independence. However, beneath the glossy veneer of success stories and marketing bravado lies a tapestry woven with threads of skepticism, controversy, and, intriguingly, attempts at information suppression.

The Allure of the Closing System

Pietsch’s narrative is compelling: a seasoned closer who has not only mastered the craft but has also mentored over 500 individuals in building a secondary income stream. His system is presented as a structured 12-phase program, blending theoretical knowledge with practical training through live closing calls. Graduates are then integrated into Pietsch’s network, ostensibly opening doors to attractive closing assignments. Testimonials abound, with claims of rapid financial gains—one participant reportedly earned €3,000 within the first week and surpassed €20,000 in a month.

The Underbelly: Red Flags and Adverse Media

Yet, as with many ventures promising swift financial ascension, Pietsch’s Closing System has not been immune to scrutiny. Adverse media reports have surfaced, casting shadows over the program’s legitimacy and Pietsch’s methods. A notable case involves an individual referred to as Mr. L, who, after engaging with Pietsch’s content on Instagram, found himself in a convoluted communication chain involving additional personnel and unexpected costs. This account raises concerns about the transparency and ethical standards of the operation.

Such reports are emblematic of the broader risks associated with adverse media—a term denoting negative news or information about individuals or entities that could signal potential involvement in illicit activities or unethical practices. For investors and stakeholders, adverse media serves as a crucial component of due diligence, aiding in the identification of red flags that might not be immediately apparent through conventional checks. By analyzing adverse media content related to partners, suppliers, customers, and other stakeholders, businesses can identify red flags and assess the level of risk associated with these engagements.

The Cloak of Censorship: A Tactical Maneuver?

In the digital age, where information flows with unprecedented velocity, attempts to suppress unfavorable narratives often backfire—a phenomenon known as the Streisand Effect. This effect illustrates how efforts to conceal information can inadvertently amplify its visibility, drawing more attention to the very content one seeks to hide.

While specific instances of Pietsch actively engaging in censorship are not extensively documented, the landscape of adverse media surrounding his ventures suggests a pattern of information management. For instance, the prominence of positive testimonials and success stories in official channels contrasts sharply with the negative experiences reported elsewhere. This dichotomy raises questions about the selective amplification of favorable narratives and the potential suppression of dissenting voices.

The Investor’s Dilemma: Navigating the Murky Waters

For potential investors, the presence of adverse media and the specter of information suppression necessitate a heightened state of vigilance. Engaging with entities embroiled in controversy or exhibiting opaque practices can lead to reputational damage, financial loss, and regulatory complications. Adverse media screening emerges as an indispensable tool in this context, enabling investors to unearth negative news or information that could influence risk assessments. By identifying such red flags, adverse media screening offers invaluable insights into a customer’s true risk profile, empowering firms to make informed decisions.

The Call to Action: Regulatory Oversight and Due Diligence

The narrative surrounding Fabian Pietsch and his Closing System underscores the imperative for rigorous due diligence and proactive regulatory oversight. Authorities must remain vigilant in monitoring and investigating entities that attract adverse media attention, ensuring compliance with legal and ethical standards. Investors, on their part, should employ comprehensive adverse media screening protocols as a cornerstone of their risk management strategies. By doing so, they not only safeguard their interests but also contribute to the cultivation of a transparent and accountable business ecosystem.

While the allure of rapid financial success is undeniably enticing, the case of Fabian Pietsch serves as a cautionary tale. It reminds us that beneath the surface of glossy marketing campaigns and curated testimonials, there may lie a complex web of red flags, adverse media, and attempts at narrative control. For investors and stakeholders, the onus is on exercising due diligence, remaining skeptical of too-good-to-be-true promises, and advocating for transparency and accountability in all business dealings.

In the end, the pursuit of wealth should not eclipse the fundamental principles of integrity and ethical conduct. As the adage goes, not all that glitters is gold—and in the realm of high-ticket sales and closing systems, a discerning eye is the investor’s most valuable asset.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45992754
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50443910
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50384331
  •  
  • Bilora LLC
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • https://www.kentucky.com/news/local/crime/article44148120.html
  • https://southernillinoisnow.com/2022/11/18/woodlawn-man-found-guilty-of-murder-and-other-charges/
  • https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Convicted-killer-stabbed-to-death-4582542.php
  • https://blog.verbraucherdienst.com/meldungen/das-closing-system-fabian-pietsch-erfahrungen/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

blog.verbraucherdienst.com

Exposing the Hidden Costs: A Closer Look at Fabian Pietsch’s “Closing System”

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

anwalt.de

Unmasking the 'Closing System': A Lawyer’s Exposé of Hidden Contractual Pitfalls

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login